[AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Re: Count of records in PK range

You are right of course.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com


Max Wanadoo wrote:
> Yes, but the question is surely "Does it have an intrinsic meaning" to which
> the answer should be no. That does not imply that it has no meaning
> whatsoever, within a programming sense.  To the End User they have no
> meaning.  To the programmer every "object" (in its broadest sense possible)
> has meaning.
> 
> Am I right?
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
> Sent: 02 April 2009 20:45
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: [AccessD] Count of records in PK range
> 
> ROTFL.
> 
> They are sequential, and they have no meaning in my databases. And even here
> all they mean is that 
> they exist.
> 
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> 
> 
> Heenan, Lambert wrote:
>> Always assuming of course that your PK is something sequential. Which
> opens up that age old topic "Should Primary Keys have any meaning?"
>> Who said that?
>>
>> Lambert