Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru
Tue Aug 11 10:33:39 CDT 2009
<<< I've looked at a number of web-based reports frameworks, and there is nothing that leaps out as a 'this is it' web reports alternative. >>> Hi Ken, What about MS ReportViewer Control and it supporting .NET Framework classlibs? You know I have done quite a few MS advanced Access Reports with 10+ years of MS Access development, as well as advanced Crystal Reports reports: yes, MS ReportViewer control has some limitations because its reports are rendered using HTML rules but that's it - I mean if we're talking about Web Applications then MS ReportViewer Control should allow to do anything you can do using MS Access Reports and more. You might need to do some things manually, which you get from MS Access Reports using built-in features but I think there shouldn't be that much of such features, and many other features MS ReportViewer Control provides more than fully compensate some "missing features".... I can be wrong, I didn't try to compare MS Access reports vs. MS ReportViewer Control reports - I'm talking just from my long term experience in development of all kinds of MS Access reports, and not so long experience of developing of MS ReportViewer control/MS SQL Reporting Services reports - I do like the latter more now... Of course just my development tools preference - BTW: .NET Framework, MS ReportViewer Control, MS SQL Server Express, C#/VB.NET Express... - they all are free.... Thank you. -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Ismert Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:02 PM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] Zoho Access Migration Plugin John, Microsoft just bought Office.com to further push its web-based Office offerings. They are in no way abandoning their desktop offerings, but they feel the need to try to counteract the movement of Google, Zoho, etc. in the web-based office applications market. That's indicative of the trend. There are a number of projects afoot which allow a web application to 'fail over' to a local data store when the internet is down, and re-sync when it is back up. As for your list of downsides: 1) Dozens of technologies On the browser, I can really think of three important ones: HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Oh, and these are internationally-defined standards, which is the critical advantage of this 'thin-client' technology over the older versions. Add a JavaScript framework, and you have four things you need to become familiar with to do a good web front-end. On the back end, your task is really no more difficult than coding unbound forms. And you have a wide choice of server-side application frameworks to help you there. 2) Server load Yes -- it is a server technology, isn't it? But Access places severe demands on the network, so we really can't claim an advantage there. 3) Integration issues I guess I'll have to hear more to understand what you mean here. 4) UI clumsy to say the least In the IE6 days, yes to a much greater extent. Now that we have IE8 as our lowest-common-denominator browser, you would be surprised at the sophistication of UI that can be achieved with standards-based HTML, CSS and a little JavaScript. Certainly more than adequate for the average data application user. 5) User UI preferences harder to deal with With CSS you have far greater ability to change the look of a web interface than anything you can get in Access. HTML forms can dynamically re-scale, and the font size can be dynamically changed, which Access can't easily do (but, I haven't used 2003 or 2007, so that may have changed). Plus there is built-in support for people with different abilities. To be fair, the one thing Access has that the web still lacks is a compelling reports capability. I've looked at a number of web-based reports frameworks, and there is nothing that leaps out as a 'this is it' web reports alternative. -Ken -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4325 (20090811) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru