Martin Reid
mwp.reid at qub.ac.uk
Fri Aug 14 13:33:06 CDT 2009
Without saying move this to OT where it belongs (<: I agree with Max. When I was ill they where outstanding. When my dad was ill again outstanding. If you break an arm or something minor you might way a few hours to be treated but once in my experience is that they are outstanding. My daughter is currently receiveing treatment and she has moved form Private treatment (ie we paid for it) to the NHS. They have opened more doors and got her into the proper treatment and do nothing but help. Have I had bad expereinces in it. Yes I have but at the end of the day if me or any of the family are ill we get looked after for "free" as does everyone else. The biggest gripe I have with the NHS is at times the time to get treatment can be really long and private woudl be very quick. But for the vast majority of people who cannot afford to go private the NHS is there. Martin WP Reid Information Services The Library at Queen's Tel : 02890976174 Email : mwp.reid at qub.ac.uk ________________________________________ From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo [max.wanadoo at gmail.com] Sent: 14 August 2009 19:11 To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: UK imposes Turks and Caicos rule A serious reply: The British NHS is outstanding. It is not without faults, but throughout my whole life it has looked after me and my family for minor and major health matters. Quite simply, it is outstanding. My biggest criticism it that it does appear to be "managerial" heavy. IOW, needs more spending on front line services, less on the bean counters. ~The new contracts for GPs and Dentists is way over the top. Our new GP was a surgeon but left that to become a GP because she can now earn >£300,000 a year. Twice what she was earning as a surgeon. Needs some fine adjustments, but basically, it really is good. Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil Salakhetdinov Sent: 14 August 2009 18:55 To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: UK imposes Turks and Caicos rule >> the cost of integrating all the uninsured >> into the medical system." I have heard UK has a satisfactory free medical care system. True/False - Max? -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 9:38 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: UK imposes Turks and Caicos rule Naww... the only thing holding them back is the cost of integrating all the uninsured into the medical system. ;) John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Heenan, Lambert wrote: > You have a point there, but good old GB held back on re-colonizing the Americas, probably because it would be too expensive, or perhaps because the USA had way more nukes than GB. > > Lambert > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:19 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: UK imposes Turks and Caicos rule > > >It also concluded there were "clear signs of political amorality and immaturity and of a general administrative incompetence". > > Uhhh... wasn't that the last Bush administration? > > <ducks and runs> > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Max Wanadoo wrote: >> AAAHH.. >> >> >> >> Good to see the good 'ol British Empire is still as good as ever. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Britain imposes direct rule on the Turks and Caicos Islands after an inquiry found evidence of government corruption and incompetence. >> >> >> View <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8202339.stm> article... >> > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4335 (20090814) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4335 (20090814) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com