jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Wed Feb 25 14:48:08 CST 2009
> ...that assumes he can tell the difference before the morning after :) PRECISELY. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com William Hindman wrote: > ...that assumes he can tell the difference before the morning after :) > > William > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Dian" <nd500_lo at charter.net> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:59 PM > To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags. > >> John, just put RANT in your subject line. That way those of us who find >> them >> interesting can read...others can just delete. Just a possible solution... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:18 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags. >> >> I need to find the property in Thunderbird "don't send rant". >> >> LOL. >> >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com >> >> >> Arthur Fuller wrote: >>> There's a little-known setting in Outlook -- Rant = Off. LOL. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:01 AM, jwcolby >> <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>wrote: >>>> > Who are you and what have you done with Colby? >>>> >>>> Who? >>>> >>>> John W. Colby >>>> www.ColbyConsulting.com <http://www.colbyconsulting.com/> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software wrote: >>>>> Who are you and what have you done with Colby? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky Smolin >>>>> Beach Access Software >>>>> 858-259-4334 >>>>> www.e-z-mrp.com >>>>> www.bchacc.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >>>>> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:10 AM >>>>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >>>>> Subject: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags. >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to apologize for the rant yesterday. Of course there is a >>>>> valid reason for using tags, actually two valid reasons. >>>>> >>>>> 1) You are capable of using them >>>>> 2) You want something that loads with the form. >>>>> >>>>> I used tags in the past for exactly those two reasons. >>>>> >>>>> I was mostly responding to the implication that NOT using the tags >>>>> was >>>> silly >>>>> when "they already exist so why not". I try very hard to use good >>>>> programming practices and I have spent a lot of time learning how to >>>>> use tools that make tags unnecessary FOR ME. The hardware, and my >>>>> knowledge >>>> of >>>>> VBA programming constructs make tags unnecessary (and bad practice) >>>>> FOR >>>> ME. >>>>> Of course if tags are the right tool for you, then you absolutely >>>>> should >>>> use >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> I will not be responding to this thread any more, and sorry for the >> rant. >>>>> -- >>>>> John W. Colby >>>>> www.ColbyConsulting.com <http://www.colbyconsulting.com/> >>>>> -- >>>>> AccessD mailing list >>>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AccessD mailing list >>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >>>> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >