Heenan, Lambert
Lambert.Heenan at aiuholdings.com
Tue Jul 21 10:37:42 CDT 2009
Well naturally! :-) Any piece of data that means something is subject to the wholly illogical whims of users who might change its meaning at any time. Less than ideal for a key. Now it's always possible to have surrogate surrogate keys: the user thinks they are looking at the key value, but it's just faked to keep them happy. :-) Lambert -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:56 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Surrogate keys suck Oooops, I forgot, I use surrogate keys. Natural keys suck and should NEVER be used. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com jwcolby wrote: > And should never be used. EVER! > > ;) > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com