[AccessD] Office 2003 and 2007

Stuart McLachlan stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Sun Jul 26 16:42:43 CDT 2009


ROTFLMAO!

-- 
Stuart

On 26 Jul 2009 at 17:34, jwcolby wrote:

> I think it is Microsoft's way of acknowledging the relative worth of the system...
> 
>  > 2003 => 2007    42 seconds
> 
> Noooo... don't do it, it sucks...
> 
>  > 2007 => 2003    14 seconds
> 
> Ahhhh.... they have come to their senses...
> 
>  > 2003 => 2007    37 seconds
> 
> No, noooooooo.... don't do it, it sucks...
> 
>  > 2007 => 2003    12 seconds
> 
> Ahhhh.... they have come to their senses again.
> 
> ;)
> 
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> 
> 
> Steve Schapel wrote:
> > Hi Susan,
> > 
> > By "expected", I meant it was acknowledged and explained by Microsoft on the 
> > release of Access 2007.  In some circles it quickly became known as "the 
> > coffee break".  I do not know the technical details - something about the 
> > versions using some of the same components, and so registry edits needing to 
> > be made depending on the current version being loaded.
> > 
> > I knew you would have installed the SPs, so that's why I was surprised to 
> > hear you say that it had got worse.
> > 
> > However, I just tried it a couple of times on my computer.
> > 2003 => 2007    42 seconds
> > 2007 => 2003    14 seconds
> > 2003 => 2007    37 seconds
> > 2007 => 2003    12 seconds
> > 
> > ... which is longer than I thought - so I must have become accustomed to it!
> > 
> > Anyway, I agree that it's a pain!
> > 
> > Regards
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Susan Harkins" <ssharkins at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:35 AM
> > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
> > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Office 2003 and 2007
> > 
> >> =====Why is it expected? I've never had this happen before with earlier
> >> versions. I've had had at least two versions, and sometimes three on my
> >> system at any given time. This has never happened before. It it did, it 
> >> was
> >> so short that I didn't even notice it. Or, I'm just getting old. :)
> >>
> >> I install all sp's as they're released. All I can tell you is that a few
> >> weeks ago it went from bad to worse -- it was taking several minutes, so I
> >> just uninstalled 2007. I'll have to install it on a different system.
> >  
> > 
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com





More information about the AccessD mailing list