Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 10:36:08 CDT 2009
Yes, got it now. Thanks Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: 28 July 2009 16:11 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Finally! Second access point in my house I think he was saying that it would be exposed to the INTERNET. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Max Wanadoo wrote: > Surly the wireless signal will ALWAYS be exposed to the public. Regardless > of where it is plugged in, it is a wireless transmission that gets broadcast > everywhere, is it not? > > Max > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: 28 July 2009 14:42 > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Finally! Second access point in my house > > >The wireless signal is always off the LAN side. Otherwise it would not be > protected by the > firewall and would be exposed on the public side. > > Ahhhh, good to know. And duhhh, of course. > > And where were you when I was struggling to get this stuff working? > > ;) > > Yep, what I have done is turn an unused router into a repeater, which is > what I have been struggling > to do for a couple of years now. I was always trying to feed the lan cable > into the wan port, which > verifiably does NOT work, at least as I have things set up. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Jim Dettman wrote: >> <<Though it is hard to tell precisely, I think the key was to turn off the >> firewall.>> >> >> Actually, the key was: >> >> <<, and feed the data into the AP via the router ports - NOT the WAN > port>> >> The firewall sits in between the WAN interface and the LAN interface. > By >> plugging into the LAN interface, you effectively disabled the firewall. >> >> What you've done is turned a router into a repeater. >> >> << The radio used >> to transmit the signal appears to hang off of the WAN side of the box, > which >> is why I was originally >> trying to feed the signal into the wan port, but with the wan side not >> connected to the internet, >> the SPI firewall is no longer needed.>> >> >> This is not the case. The wireless signal is always off the LAN side. >> Otherwise it would not be protected by the firewall and would be exposed > on >> the public side. >> >> Jim. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:06 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: [AccessD] Finally! Second access point in my house >> >> Well, I finally accomplished it, creating a second WIRED wireless access >> point at the far end of a >> cable at my house. >> >> I am doing the "responsible parent" thing and creating the public location >> computer for my kids, out >> in the living room. Unfortunately the available location was across the >> room from the cable that I >> had run for my Windows Media Center PC, so I needed wireless. While I had > a >> wireless access point >> mid house in the basement directly under my wife's office, by the time the >> signal got up to the PC >> in the living room it was just too weak to hold a reliable connection. >> >> I have been trying for AGES to get a second access point in the house. It >> seems so simple, place a >> second wireless AP (a wireless router) at the far end of the cable and let >> it broadcast on a >> different channel. Well.... I had tried and tried and TRIED different >> things but last night, quite >> by accident(kinda) I found the solution. >> >> The solution in MY CASE was to turn off the SPI firewall, turn off the > DHCP >> server, set the channel >> to the far end away from the other AP (primary AP on channel 11 and >> secondary on channel 1), and >> feed the data into the AP via the router ports - NOT the WAN port. To be >> honest, feeding the WAN >> port MIGHT work, however once I got it running (which happened feeding it >> via the router port) I >> didn't go back and try it. >> >> A wireless router has two independent interfaces, each of which requires > an >> IP address to access. >> However it is the router interface which is used to program the router, > and >> this IP address normally >> sits at 192.168.0.1. In my case I had changed my address range to >> 192.168.122.1 to 192.168.122.255. >> Thus my main router sits at 192.1687.122.1. >> >> My second access point had to be modified to be something in the >> 192.168.122.x range so I put it up >> at the top end, 192.168.122.149. Thus to program that router (the second >> AP) I had to now use that >> address. >> >> Though it is hard to tell precisely, I think the key was to turn off the >> firewall. The radio used >> to transmit the signal appears to hang off of the WAN side of the box, > which >> is why I was originally >> trying to feed the signal into the wan port, but with the wan side not >> connected to the internet, >> the SPI firewall is no longer needed. >> >> So that is it. I have successfully turned a full on router into a simple >> wireless access point >> hanging on the far end of a cable. I have more signal than you can shake > a >> stick at in my living >> room, and that part of life is good at Colby Manor. >> -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com