Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 10:56:42 CDT 2009
>> Give me good individual programs any day Ok, how much will you pay for it? Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: 28 July 2009 16:47 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] F'n 2007 The object models are different, so it's reasonable that the language would be implemented differently, especially since separate teams worked to develop each version. It took a while for them to bring some of the apps over from the Mac and they bought others. On the other hand, that's how other suites have been created, so it isn't just Microsoft. I remember when Lotus came out with Symphony, which was built all of a piece and drove me nuts! Give me good individual programs any day. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Darryl Collins Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 5:45 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] F'n 2007 I think a big part of the issue is Office was never originally an integrated product, rather a collection of software bundled up. It sort of grew into a suite of applications over time, but early on they were all totally separate apps each built with their own idiosyncrasies. That DNA is still lurking under the hood today. Even in VBA, Excel VBA is rather different than Access VBA to achieve the same thing. cheers Darryl. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com