Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Mon Jun 8 16:02:11 CDT 2009
Hi Max Now what is this? An impatient youngster (aged 65?) who can't browse the archive? Anyway, Jim is right. Creating a temp table with an AutoNumber is much faster than using the traditional subquery. However, here is the other method from 2001 using a sequential variable and taking care of the issue Charlotte mentions: http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/htdig/accessd/2005-June/035324.html and another one here using a static collection which is extremely fast - and smart too - as it can be used in a select query you browse(!): http://databaseadvisors.com/pipermail/accessd/2006-May/044208.html /gustav >>> max.wanadoo at gmail.com 08-06-2009 21:09 >>> Any takers please? Max -----Original Message----- From: Max Wanadoo [mailto:max.wanadoo at gmail.com] Sent: 08 June 2009 19:14 To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: SQL Gurus - Running count. Hi Guys, With a select statement, how do I get a running count matching the rows return. Starting at 1 and incrementing by 1 for each row. The final count to be equal to the number of rows returned. The count to be part of the query. I also want a second Count but this time not incremented. Just a 1 in a column for each row returned. Thanks Max