Tony Septav
iggy at nanaimo.ark.com
Mon Jun 22 15:54:06 CDT 2009
Hey Drew I don't know what a VPN is, but on all my network systems we have never run into a problem. Thanks Tony Drew Wutka wrote: >Not Oracle? Yikes! <grin> > >As an ardent fan of Access (especially Access 97), I must admit that >knowledge in a server side database can come in real handy! On a normal >network, an .mdb solution works fine, but try using it over a VPN, and >yikes..... > >Drew > >-----Original Message----- >From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tony Septav >Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:15 PM >To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >Subject: [AccessD] Learning .Net > >Hey All >Like many of you on this list I have to admit I am an old fart. Must >mention that I deal with small to medium sized netwroked businesses. As >has been stated it is hard to "teach an old fart new tricks". Like many >of you I realize that I have to learn SQL Server and .Net or go the way >of the dinosaur. But to me that is playing into the industry marketing >"flavour of the day". Other than the IT Borg saying it will not put >your ACCESS application on our system, I don't really see how it matters > >what language you use. If you produce a fast, user friendly application > >that is easy, intuitive and bullet proof for the user, who cares. If the > >industry marketers would allow I could still use Lotus 123 for DOS to >develop number crunching spreadsheets that 80% of the users would be >quite content to use because it produces the results they are looking. >Same with ACCESS, I still have 97 Apps out there being updated and >working fine. I have not seen any "earth shattering" advances to >spread/work sheet and database concepts since their original design, >only silly bells and whistles. >I could be wrong and I know many of you will set me straight. >Why SQL Server and not Oracle????? > >