David Emerson
newsgrps at dalyn.co.nz
Tue Jun 23 14:05:47 CDT 2009
Max, Can you please expand on your suggestion. How do you use me.dirty=false to force it to write edits away? David At 22/06/2009, you wrote: >David, just a stab in the dark, but it sounds as if it hasn't written away >the previous edit you made on the same machine. > >I often use me.dirty=false to force it to write edits away. > >Max > > >-----Original Message----- >From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of David Emerson >Sent: 22 June 2009 09:46 >To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >Subject: [AccessD] Write Conflict SQL and adp > >I have an SQL2005 BE and Access XP adp FE. > >The database is used to track stock for a number >of locations. Each stored procedure has a filter for location > >Most of the record sources are stored procedures >that combine multiple tables (the extra tables >are for sorting the records - for example a >products table is joined to the inventory table >so that the inventory can be sorted by product order). > >I have the unique tables set where I can, and the > >I am getting a "write conflict - This record has >been changed by another user . " error when I >try to change a record a second time when it is displayed in a continuous >form. > >I have tried Googling. The main solution is to >include a timestamp field in every table. This I have done with no joy. > >Any thoughts on what I should look for? Should I >be looking at the SQL security setting for roles? > > >Regards > >David Emerson >Dalyn Software Ltd >Wellington, New Zealand > > >-- >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >-- >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com