William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Mon Jun 29 04:01:08 CDT 2009
Shamil http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/tags/Access+14/default.aspx ...that's the Access 14 team manager's blog. William -------------------------------------------------- From: "Shamil Salakhetdinov" <shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:41 AM To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Poll on Access 2007 > Hi Steve, > > I have heard there are should be many new features in MS Access 2010 - is > that information on "What's new in MS Access 2010" already available > somewhere? > > Don't take "attacks" on your opinion on MS Access 2007 pros&cons too close > to yourself - such "attacks" is a usual way to discuss "hot" topics here - > welcome to the club! :) > > As for MS listening or not to MS Access (VBA) developers: they are > listening > I think but they apply a strong "noise filter" on what they hear - and > that > filter does very probably filter out many things advanced MS Access (VBA) > developers urge for but MS finds them to be irrelevant to their own > business... > > Microsoft do you hear me? :) > > Thank you. > > -- > Shamil > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Steve Schapel > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:28 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Poll on Access 2007 > > Darryl, > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Darryl Collins" <Darryl.Collins at coles.com.au> > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:31 PM > >> ... I hope you are backing the right horse here Steve. > > Thanks very much for your comments. As you know, we are rapidly > approaching > > the release of the next version. Access 2007 was always going to be an > interim measure, as a step moving towards new paradigms. I will have a > better idea whether I'm backing the right horse after we have built some > Access 2010 apps. > >> MS Access has been on the edge before and I think it is now again. > > Ever since I first started using Access in 1994, there have been vehement > claims in one quarter or another that Access is dead, Microsoft is > dropping > Access, X and Y are better than Access, etc. I don't know about "on the > edge", but really a turning point. What I think will happen is that those > who abandon Access because of the new directions, will be replaced by > others > > who embrace it and move forward with it. > > If you're one of those who moves to other technologies, I understand the > reasons, and have no criticism, and I hope there is nothing I have said to > imply otherwise. I wish you well with that. But for me, at this stage it > looks like I will be sticking with Access for the long haul. > > -- > Regards > Steve > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > database 4194 (20090628) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.esetnod32.ru > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >