Jim Dettman
jimdettman at verizon.net
Tue Jun 30 11:40:30 CDT 2009
Susan, I think it was mostly due to the fact that I worked on my own (and didn't have any intentions of expanding), but worked as an employee of Online Computer Services, Inc. Legally, it would be the company stipulating that it would provide services for a fee. Not sure how good of a lawyer he was though<g>. Probably should have checked into it more at the time, but work on a straight $/hr rate seemed more attractive. No contracts to sign and either party can walk away at any time. Since I bill bi-monthly, everyone is always on the same page and I've had none of the nonsense that went on when I did project work. Of course laws have changed considerably over the years, so that advice even if sound at the time might not be true today. But like I said, $/hr has worked well and I've never looked back... Jim. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:48 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Retainers (was: Converting . . .) Interesting that a lawyer told you this. Their entire professionals works mostly on retainer. Susan H. > > "A retainer, by acceptable definition is simply a guarantee that you'll be > there to do their work for them, not that you'll do whatever they want for > a > > one-time payment. " > > At one time I was considering doing this, but a lawyer friend advised me > not to because of that. He said that if I became sick or hurt and unable > to > complete work, it opened the door for lawsuits. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com