jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu Mar 5 12:47:02 CST 2009
> ...how many times has MS claimed an Access bug was "fixed" only to find out later that it wasn't or the "fix" introduced a new problem Such a cynic... ;) John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com William Hindman wrote: > ...how many times has MS claimed an Access bug was "fixed" only to find out > later that it wasn't or the "fix" introduced a new problem ...I have AC > turned off and use F&R instead ...I used to much prefer Speed Ferret from > Black Moshannon but they've not updated it past 2002 ...shame that :( > > William > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:10 PM > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Changing Table Names > >> Name AutoCorrect was a disaster in 2000 and has been regarded with >> suspicion every since, but I don't know how much of that is holdover >> from the original problems and how much has actually been tested. Like >> all such "features" Microsoft provides, it can be a two-edged sword, >> even if it not longer corrupts databases. I generally made of habit of >> turning off all the helpful default settings and only turning on the >> ones I really wanted. >> >> Charlotte Foust >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:52 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Changing Table Names >> >> Big concern on the corruption?? >> >> Back when it came out there were horror stories with the feature so we >> all just kinda quite using it. It is on by default IIRC when you create >> a new db and I have left it on by mistake. I have never had it bite me, >> in fact I marveled at how well it worked. >> >> That is a useful feature for their target market, the "power user". >> AFAICT it still exists clear out in 2007 so perhaps MS spent the time to >> fix the bugs. >> >> AFAIK neither it nor Rick's Find and Replace change the name of tables >> or fields out in the BE from inside of the FE. I could be wrong though. >> >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com >> >> >> Keith Williamson wrote: >>> Well...I'm the only one using it...so that part isn't a concern. But, >>> certainly, I don't want to corrupt it. :) My application is fairly >>> simple....mostly just queries that churn and burn data from our SQL >>> accounting application. Big concern on the corruption?? >>> >>> Keith Williamson | Associate, Asst. Controller | kwilliamson at rtkl.com >>> >>> RTKL Associates Inc. | 901 South Bond St. | Baltimore, MD 21231 >>> >>> 410.537.6098 Direct | 410.276.4232 Fax | www.rtkl.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >>> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:21 PM >>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >>> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Changing Table Names >>> >>> >>> > I usually use Rick Fishers Find and replace to do that type of >>> thing.. >>> >>> I also use this tool. >>> >>> OTOH turning on the property in the database mostly kinda sorta works. >>> >>> Options / General / Name autocorrect. >>> >>> OTOH it might also corrupt your database, slow things down, allow >>> users to change things unintentionally etc. >>> >>> John W. Colby >>> www.ColbyConsulting.com >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >