Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 14:40:29 CDT 2009
>. <snicker> You can snicker all you want, Charlotte. Me? I am leaping with JOY! I have intellisense in the Treeview - Yes! Believe it or not! I also have the treeview loading correctly with a recursive call function - yippee hi ya - C'mon Bruce Willis let's see ya beat that! I also know why that error comes with the imagelist (if anybody is interested) Max Ps. Now what do I do with it. This is the hard part - hmm? Thinks....must be sommat it can be used for? Oh well, back to the pub Pps A BIG, BIG thank you to Jack and his links - both those links were brill! Yes, Jack I will post it to anybody who wants it, but I need to make it into something that is useable first. I am only just off my tummy onto my kneew. Wait until I can stand and I will send it to you. Good man, Jack! -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: 10 March 2009 18:27 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again LOL What good does intellisense do you if you get the wrong combination of items? Have fun at the pub. <snicker> Charlotte -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:22 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again >!! Where's that lateral thinking, Max? Sob! Shudder! (Puts back of hand on temple, looks to the sky and blinks the tear away).. It went out of the window - laterally and literally. Max I'm Off to the pub! That always helps! (by which I mean, it postpones the headaches until later). When I come back, I'm going to stamp my feet until somebody tells me that there is Intellisense available! -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: 10 March 2009 18:09 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again ROTFL If you think that's bad, wait until you start looking at .Net examples, which not only come from different angles but even from different languages!! Where's that lateral thinking, Max? The reason there are so many approaches is because you can do it any number of ways, depending on what you want to accomplish and the kind of blinders you wear on your thinking. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:01 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again Charlotte, You mean the breakdown comes later in the day, giving you time to start smoking and other long forgotten bad habits out of frustration. Do you know what the real problem I am having with this Treeview. It is the fact that each example I look at comes at it from a different angle. It is quite a flexible beast, but none of them do what I want and none of them are complete in themselves, so I am jumping back and forth trying to figure out what argument goes where and does what. Oh for intelisense with treeviews!! Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: 10 March 2009 17:44 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again I think treeviews are much easier in .Net. Does that persuade you?? ;-> Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:27 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again Thanks Charlotte, I can't go to .net 'cos I am currently wrestling with TreeViews - ha! Driving me nuts. One breakdown at a time! Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: 10 March 2009 17:20 To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again Well, don't look at me! I jumped ship to .Net rather than have to wrestle with 2007. It does have its fans, but I've met only a few of them and they *started* with 2007, so they don't know any better. LOL Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:15 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again Thanks Rocky. Anybody got any other thoughts please? Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software Sent: 10 March 2009 16:33 To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again I don't think you'll find any 2007 fans on this list. I still develop in 2003 for the same reason. Can't figure out how 2007 works - don't have a compelling reason to use it. I have 2007 loaded on another machine just for testing. But all the 03 stuff works on 07 just dandy. Rocky Smolin Beach Access Software 858-259-4334 www.e-z-mrp.com www.bchacc.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:27 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again Hi List, I am about to throw in the towel with Access 2007. I find it so incredibly hard to work with - as I have often mentioned before. Before I actually do that, can I ask this questions... Is there anything that is a real improvement over 2003? Either that I can bring to the development for the end-user that I cannot do in 2003 or that makes the development easier than 2003 (I think I know the answer to that one!). I don't want to shoot myself in the foot here. If, beneath the skin, the development side is not basically the same (not talking about cosmetic stuff, but has real substantially improved dev stuff) then I will need to take that on board. I am not looking for a List of differences - just your gut reactions please. Thank you Max -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com