Steve Erbach
erbachs at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 13:06:52 CDT 2009
John, Did you really have DotNetNuke 2.X (two dot X)? Gad! The oldest DNN book I've got is for DNN 3.x. I presume that 2.X had SQL Server as a back-end. When you upgraded, did you use the Upgrade version of DNN? I would think that it might be worth the effort to import data from the 2.X SQL tables into the 4.X tables. I went through some issues with messing around with DNN on my web host. An upgrade went badly and I wound up manually renaming all the existing DNN tables and then starting a fresh DNN install with the latest version at the time. I changed the default table prefix to "nuke_", for what it's worth. I was smart, for once: I backed up the SQL Server stuff BEFORE making the drastic re-install. Steve Erbach Neenah, WI On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:57 PM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > This is a test that AccessD can send to my new email server. I have changed hosting companies and > in the process upgraded from DotNetNuke 2.X to 4.X. As a result I lost all of my users on the other > server (hosting company). It appears that it is non-trivial bordering on impossible to migrate said > users so I would encourage all folks on AccessD who get this email to build a new user on my web site. > > I just modified the domain name pointers about an hour or two so it is possible that you might see > my old site for another couple of hours, depending on how quickly your domain name servers refresh. > > Anyway, my new site is up. It will involve a rather large rebuild from what I have so I beg for > your patience. > > Thanks, > > -- > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com