Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 10:42:12 CDT 2009
I recently did a project for a government ministry. My original thought was to put a local copy of the FE on each PC and a single copy of the BE on a server, and was given a flat no. The guy went on to explain that all local PCs are created from a single image, so anything added since then would be destroyed the next time the drive was imaged. I could see his point. Every once in a while, say when they decide to upgrade Office or something, they just recreate the image file and then update the thousand or so PCs scattered around the province, all done remotely. I definitely see the sense in this approach. Arthur On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Tony Septav <iggy at nanaimo.ark.com> wrote: > Thanks Gustav > I will try to register the existing ocx and see if that solves the > problem first. If not and as you are saying it shouldn't cause a > problem on her machine (that is what bothered me, goofing around with > someone elses settings, also they have a very possessive/territorial IT > group who would love nothing better than to clobber a contractor for > screwing something up), I will follow your instructions and rename the > exisiting ocx and copy in my ocx. > > Thanks again. > > >