[AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question

...iirc the last time JC and Drew got into a heated debate, JC abandoned 
AccessD for several months :)

William

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:02 PM
To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question

> Hi Max
>
> Relax. It is not our Drew but a TROLL who has hijacked his identity!
>
> /gustav
>
>
>>>> max.wanadoo at gmail.com 30-03-2009 19:48 >>>
> Oh dear.
> Well, if common sense won't prevail I have no option.  I was hoping not to
> go to this extent, but you leave me no option.  Call in the big
> battalions...
>
> JC - Sort him out!
>
> Max
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Drew Wutka
> Sent: 30 March 2009 18:45
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question
>
> So you are saying that a little light makes it 0 dark?  How odd, a
> little heat, and it's still cold.....
>
> Open your mind Neo...
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:38 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question
>
> Hmmm....Drew that is just silly.
>
>>, absolutely no darkness is not known....
>
> It is and it come every morning through my window.  We call it light but 
> you
> may know it by other names, eg sunshine!
>
> Max
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Drew Wutka
> Sent: 30 March 2009 18:31
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question
>
> You've got that flipped.  Absolute darkness is known, absolutely no
> darkness is not known....
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question
>
> Hi Drew
>
> What kind of fun tobacco are you smoking??
> Total darkness = zero light is very well defined and known.
>
> /gustav
>
>
>>>> DWUTKA at marlow.com 30-03-2009 18:43 >>>
> So?
>
> Darkness is just the opposite... no (known) bottom limit...
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:04 AM
> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question
>
> Hi Drew
>
> Because a light stream is energy with a defined zero level and no
> (known) upper limit.
>
> /gustav
>
>>>> DWUTKA at marlow.com 30-03-2009 16:42 >>>
> ..  We measure brightness in units of light.  Why don't we measure it in
> units of darkness?
>
>
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>