rusty.hammond at cpiqpc.com
rusty.hammond at cpiqpc.com
Thu May 21 08:38:14 CDT 2009
Anita, Do you happen to a have a link to that microsoft patch or at least any articles at microsoft talking about the issue? -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Anita Smith Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:51 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] An interesting "feature" in SQL Server John, I have stopped using bit fields as they play up on Access continous forms when using tick boxes. Microsoft has a patch but it doesn't always fix the problem. Anita On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>wrote: > I am starting work on a database at an old client that was converted > to SQL Server. I discovered that if I enter records into a table that > contains a bit field, and that bit field is allowed to store a null > value, then any time I try to edit any field in that record (at least > through ODBC) I get a "you have attempted to update a record being > edited by another user" > kind of error message and > the update fails. I had to go into Management studio and set the bit > to either a zero or a -1 at which point the edits work normally after > that. > > Loverly. > > -- > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com <http://www.colbyconsulting.com/> > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com ********************************************************************** WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received, scanned or otherwise recorded by the CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc. corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. **********************************************************************