William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Sun May 24 05:38:37 CDT 2009
...Arthur reminds me of the preacher on Sunday morning who somehow knows you were out drinking the night before :) William -------------------------------------------------- From: "jwcolby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 5:32 PM To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] An interesting "feature" in SQL Server > Oh boy, here we go again. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Arthur Fuller wrote: >> That's a good approach, David. The rest of this thread really causes skin >> rash due to its misunderstanding of the purpose of NULL values. NULL is a >> valid value. I've said this before and I'm saying it again. Force a NULL >> value to anything else (which includes defaulting a column to some value) >> is >> IMO a fundamental design error, indicative of one of two problems: >> >> 1. you don't understand the data domain >> 2. the domain itself is incoherent. >> >> My $.02. >> Arthur > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >