Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Sat Nov 14 05:55:49 CST 2009
Hi Mark True. I only do Access/VBA these days when maintaining code. Working with Visual Studio is so challenging - in a positive way - and so flexible and powerful that it runs away with you leaving no wish to look back. /gustav >>> shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru 14-11-2009 01:33 >>> Hi Mark -- Have a look - http://northwind.codeplex.com Delivered before planned schedule: http://northwind.codeplex.com/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=54924 I personally have made quite some others in time or ahead planned schedule, I guess Gustav and Charlotte also have such positive experience with developing .NET applications... Thank you. -- Shamil ;) -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 3:10 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access/SQL Funny, I've never seen a dot-net application delivered "on time". > Doug -- > > .NET development made by experienced developers is as RAD as > MS Access or even "RAD-der"... > AFAIK experienced .NET developers are usually fluent with SQL > - MS Access or MS SQL backends - and they have so many ways > to communicate with backend to select from, which Access > developers never had... > > One of the huge advantages for .NET apps is that starting > from simple WinForm apps or console utilities you can scale > your apps almost endlessly (horizontally, vertically, > "diagonally"....) using the same code base: there will be no > way/it will be very expensive to do that if you start with MS > Access frontend. > > -- > Shamil