William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Sat Nov 14 21:21:37 CST 2009
...its not a matter of "better" ...it's a matter of resources ...when I started with dot net my natural path was to learn vb.net ...but what I found is that there are far more examples written in c# available on the net than vb.net ...and once I started looking at those examples, including translations done by the web based code converters, it turned out that the syntax wasn't all that different ...so I started playing with c# and its now my language of choice but by no means expertise. ...there is no natural upgrade path from a vb app to a vb.net app, it's a whole new paradigm, vb in name only ...thus a lot of vb programmers and apps never made the transition ...otoh, C# has a lot in common with past C and Java languages and a lot of them did make the transition to C# and dot net ...and they brought their tools and samples along. William -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mark Simms" <marksimms at verizon.net> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 9:53 PM To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access/SQL >> >> I know I'm picking on you, but I get quickly frustrated with >> arguments over which choice to make when the selection >> criteria are not based on something concrete. >> >> Dan >> > The DICE stats ARE CONCRETE. If VB.NET were better, I think the ratio > would > be reversed. > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >