Rocky Smolin
rockysmolin at bchacc.com
Wed Nov 25 16:51:11 CST 2009
Hey - older apps for older guys, no? -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:17 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Time warp? And I support an interest banking application that was written almost 40 years ago. The best it can do graphically do is emphasis letters but it is paid for, works every time and it is easy to support. My thoughts on an application on whether it should be upgraded; is whether it does what it is supposed to. If the answer is 'yes' it stays and if 'no'... time to change. Why change just to change. I support more 'older' apps than I do new ones. ;-) Access97 was perhaps the best version of Access ever created; maybe one of the best application ever built. It was and is a mile post of its time. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Doug Steele Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:30 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: [AccessD] Time warp? I just received an Access database from a client, generated by Walmart's very sophisticated online supplier reporting system. I was interested to find out if it would be in Access 2007 or 2003 format. Wrong on both counts - Access 97! Doug Steele -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com