[AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Re: Form Controls - Class implementation

Shamil Salakhetdinov shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru
Tue Oct 27 15:22:07 CDT 2009


Guys,

Recursion could help to make the coding cleaner and more generic, couldn't
it?
Does your current version of code support stacked tab controls, tab controls
within subforms, ...?

Thank you.

--Shamil 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of A.D.Tejpal
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:39 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Re: Form Controls - Class implementation

JC,

    Thanks for providing a nice class based solution so promptly. Your well 
known command over classes deserves to be complimented.

    While conducting tests (Access 2003 desktop), it was found that listing 
of controls on form sections as displayed in the message box, is not always 
in keeping with the tab index. For example, if the tab index in form header 
is altered in design view and the form re-opened after saving, the results 
are not found consistent.

    It seems that while building the control collection in the class, 
greater reliability could be achieved by pouring the contents of a temporary

class into the main one in the order of tab index.

    It would also appear that the extra round of iteration just for finding 
tab controls and their pages could be eliminated.

    Suggested modified versions incorporating the points outlined above are 
placed below, in the following sequence:

    (a) Class C_CtlsByTabIndex
    (b) Class C_CtlsByTabIndexMaster
    (c) Code in form's module

Best wishes,
A.D. Tejpal
------------

<<< snip >>
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4549 (20091027) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.esetnod32.ru
 




More information about the AccessD mailing list