FreddyCat
freddycat99 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 26 19:11:30 CDT 2009
Max, Tina I watched a NOVA episode about Andrew Wiles and his struggle to solve this. I don't know if that episode is available in original format. This is a related link http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/ Fred On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Max Wanadoo <max.wanadoo at gmail.com> wrote: > The link wants me to sign up. Post the link if it is genuine. > > I know that there is no proof for a cube where (x^n + y^n = z^n). > > But > > I do there is proof for a cube where 2(x^n + y^n = z^n) which is a cube > when > n=2. > > > Max > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tina Norris > Fields > Sent: 26 September 2009 18:03 > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Computer prose > > Hi Max, > > Sorry, it wasn't Fermi, it was Fermat. Here it is: > > > Fermat's last theorem > > Statement that there are no natural numbers /x/, /y/, and /z/ such that > /x/^/n/ + /y/^/n/ = /z/^/n/ , in which /n/ is a natural number greater > than 2. About this, Pierre de Fermat > <http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Fermat%2c+Pierre+de> wrote > in 1637 in his copy of Diophantus's Arithmetica, “I have discovered a > truly remarkable proof but this margin is too small to contain it.” > Although the theorem was subsequently shown to be true for many specific > values of /n/, leading to important mathematical advances in the > process, the difficulty of the problem soon convinced mathematicians > that Fermat never had a valid proof. In 1995 the British mathematician > Andrew Wiles (b. 1953) and his former student Richard Taylor (b. 1962) > published a complete proof, finally solving one of the most famous of > all mathematical problems. > > For more information on Fermat's last theorem > < > http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/_/gr.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.b > > ritannica.com%2Feb%2Farticle-9034050%2FFermats-last-theorem&source=Britannic<http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/_/gr.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.b%0Aritannica.com%2Feb%2Farticle-9034050%2FFermats-last-theorem&source=Britannic> > a>, > visit Britannica.com. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Copyright © > 1994-2008 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. > > I was unaware that the complete proof had been published. I don't think > my Dad knows that either, so I'm going to send this one off to him, too. > > T > > > Max Wanadoo wrote: > > Have you got a URL for it Tina? > > > > Tried google but too much fluff. > > > > Max > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tina Norris > > Fields > > Sent: 24 September 2009 15:08 > > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Computer prose > > > > Arthur, if you get Fermi's Last Theorem resolved, please let me know. > > My Dad's been working on that one, off and on, for about 40 years, now, > > I think. > > T > > > > Arthur Fuller wrote: > > > >> Shamil, Russian novelists have nothing to apologize for. IMO they rank > >> > > among > > > >> the greatest ever born. > >> The only real issue in Russian lit (I didn't actually take a course from > >> Nabokov when he taught at Cornell, but my then-girlfriend did, and she > >> > > gave > > > >> me all her notes to read. Nabokov and I see Russian novels from > completely > >> opposite perspectives. That's cool. I like opposing views, they > stimulate > >> discussion! Nabokov preferred Tolstoy, I preferred Dostoevsky. We both > >> > > loved > > > >> Gogol, a commonality among major other differences. Nabokov believed > that > >> every single detail within a scene was crucial. My GF once faced an exam > >> from him, containing a single question, which I cannot quote, but it > went > >> approximately like this: when Count Vronski said xxx, what colour were > the > >> walls in the room? Whereas my exam question might have been, was > >> > > Raskalnikov > > > >> crazy, and if so why, and if not why not? Or going further back to > Gogol, > >> was it crazy or mere opportunism to sell dead souls? A strange > >> > > perspective: > > > >> Russia as the birth of capitalist oppression. LOL. > >> > >> Anyway, Shamil, I would be most interested in your take on "A Martian > >> > > Sends > > > >> a Postcard Home." I deem it a truly great work, and I made it through > >> without reference to the notes, although I admit that it took me a > couple > >> > > of > > > >> days to work it out. > >> > >> Meanwhile, I'm back to trying to resolve Fermi's Last Theorem. It's > tough! > >> > >> A. > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Shamil Salakhetdinov < > >> shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> 2B || !2B ? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Shamil > >>> > >>> P.S. FYI: In Russia eternal questions are: "Who is guilty?" and "What > to > >>> do?" with "Who is guilty?" one taking 99% of the time to "chat about" > for > >>> ages now... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >