Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 08:58:00 CST 2010
> Lets and gets are optional. In fact (IIRC) Drew insists that he NEVER uses them. aha! not REAL Classes then - LOL Anyway, I think we wil lleave it there. thanks Max On 28/01/2010, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > > still obfuscation however. > > A quick Google provides: > > Obfuscation is the concealment of intended meaning in communication, making > communication confusing, > intentionally ambiguous, and more difficult to interpret. > > Obfuscation requires intent. > > I have to assume that your intended meaning was Abstruse. > > Abstruse: difficult to penetrate; incomprehensible to one of ordinary > understanding or knowledge. > > The problem with defining Classes as Abstruse is that term "one of ordinary > understanding or > knowledge". If you are going to use that term about classes, then it > implies knowing classes is not > ordinary. > > I make the assumption that no one on this list is ordinary. That only > leaves their understanding. > > Classes are quite ordinary to me, and are quite ordinary to many others on > this list. I have long > maintained that they SHOULD BE ordinary to almost everyone on this list, and > if not you should work > on that to make them ordinary. > > Most of us are professionals Max. Having one of the most powerful tools in > the toolbox be Abstruse > is not a good place to be. > > > All those LETS and GETS just to parse a string. > > Lets and gets are optional. In fact (IIRC) Drew insists that he NEVER uses > them. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Max Wanadoo wrote: >> still obfuscation however. >> >> All those LETS and GETS just to parse a string. >> >> max > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >