Darren - Active Billing
darren at activebilling.com.au
Mon Mar 8 20:56:24 CST 2010
Hi Arthur We use an interface to subversion called Tortoise - We don't mind using it here. it works well enough (Our real developer nerds prefer the command line version only Anyway. once you decide to set up a checkout on Folder X, each time you make changes to ANY file or files (even adding or deleting) to items in that folder then those new pieces of information 'go up' with any 'commit'. You are given the option to type stuff about the commit you are about to make also. If you decide that you need to go back to a certain version then the 'log' feature allows you to review the entire upload/download history for that checkout location. This is where whatever you type about the 'commits' is useful. There are also file comparison tools built in with this. As for filename vs objects - It's file name based. Assume I have filename called MyCooldB.mdb - I add it to subversion, each change gets committed and the whole file is placed under version control. Hope this makes sense Darren -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2010 4:51 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: [AccessD] Access + SubVersion Does anyone here use SubVersion as your VCS from Access? I used to use VSS and was satisfied with it, but it seems this product has gone away in favour of the Team stuff. I can't afford that upgrade, and so am wondering about free alternatives such as SubVersion. Does anyone here use this in practise? How ought one store a Version into SubVersion and then name it and be able to Restore any Version long after it was captured and stored? Any bugaboos in using this method are graciously invited. A. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com