jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sat Mar 13 20:57:09 CST 2010
I am with William on this one. I have been working in Access (pre2k7) for so long I can code with my eyes closed. I have my framework, I have just so many years experience, I cannot tell you that I can develop an app in C# anywhere close to as fast. But is that a fair comparison? And the bottom line is that C# and .Net is in an entirely different league than Access and VBA in terms of sheer capability, as well as stability. Potentially C# is entirely license cost free to the client. Assuming that I do not have to automate Excel or Word, there is zero license cost for my application, whereas there is a per seat license for Access. C# and Access is simply not apples to apples. It is more like an entire box of every fruit you can think of to a single apple. Throw in SQL Server Express, and DMO and suddenly you have an M1 tank running over the apple that is Access. http://www.sqlteam.com/article/introduction-to-sql-dmo As William said so well, if it has to be quick and cheap, Access is still King. If it is going to be enterprise wide and the enterprise is more than 50 or so seats, or it is ever going to need a web interface, or it is ever going to manage a huge database or (lots of other places that Access is not a good fit)... I love Access, but I am learning a much more powerful tool, and C# / SQL Server is a MUCH more powerful tool. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Doug Steele wrote: > William, would you say that the time you now take to develop an app in VS is > comparable to the time you would have taken to develop the same app in > Access? I've done one small project this year in C# and it probably took me > five times as long as Access would have. I realize that I will get faster > with practice, but how much? > > Thanks, > Doug > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:47 AM, William Hindman < > wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com> wrote: > >> gustav >> >> ...there are so many such goodies in VS that you can't even cover the >> highlights in a single post. >> >> William >> >>