jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sun Mar 14 12:02:05 CDT 2010
I would pretty much agree on that, 2008 is pretty darned awesome, and the express version of 2008 would be preferable to standard 2005. I have no experience with the 2010 version yet. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com William Hindman wrote: > ...yes and no ...there are so many improvements in VS2008 and 2010 in the > Express versions, over the VS2005 Standard version that unless I needed > something not available in the later Express versions, I'd choose the 2010 > Express version over the 2005 Standard every time ...and the Standard > version is not much more capable than the Express versions anyway ...I > bought the 2008 Pro version as the lowest one that met all my foreseeable > needs after starting with the 2008 Express version. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "jwcolby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 12:47 AM > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Re: Visual Studio Express > >> Rocky, >> >> The express editions are slightly crippled versions of the standard >> editions. They are actually >> quite capable of developing full on applications, but if you have standard >> then you certainly do not >> want to use express. >> >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com