Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 15 15:36:08 CDT 2010
I think they are refering to main stem languages not sub-derivatives from small culture based dialecs. IOW, over here.... Max -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:16 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Treeview/Listview OCX Disabled by MS Or Minnesota - EH? -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of David McAfee Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:54 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Treeview/Listview OCX Disabled by MS We know that John, but which English? Southern California dude dialect? Texas Twang? New York GTFO of here? or those funny sounding guys that often misspell words over the pond? ;) D On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:43 PM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > English IS better! > > ;) > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Jim Lawrence wrote: >> I full-heartedly agree with you. The basic creation of the .Net >> infrastructure was to allow the designer to write code in any way >> they want. >> >> >> There are dozens of CLI languages that can be used and if you are extending >> you applications to the web the count increases dramatically. You can >> mix and match within a single app...Any mashup that can get an >> application running >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CLI_languages >> >> The argument that one language runs faster than another is simply not true; >> any longer. My thought is use what ever language feels good to you or >> has the most 'field tested' code and has the features you need. >> >> Single language apps are the old way of thinking. Show me what an >> application can do and frankly I could not care less what it was >> written in. >> >> >> It is similar to saying English is better. >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust >> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:30 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Treeview/Listview OCX Disabled by MS >> >> Well, gentlemen, I stand by VB.Net since I absolutely hate the C# >> syntax and "punctuation". I can read it, but I don't want to write >> it. Of course, >> since I'm old enough not to have to expect to keep doing this, I can indulge >> myself by NOT learning C#. I do rather object to the avalanche >> towards it >> in the VB list, though. Seems like the fact that the language isn't >> the important thing gets forgotten. >> >> Charlotte Foust >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 8:28 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] SPAM-LOW: Treeview/Listview OCX Disabled by MS >> >> I second pretty much everything William said, EXCEPT that I did not >> find C# >> syntax all that trivial >> to pick up. But like William I forced myself to do it and I am happy >> I did. >> >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com >> >> >> William Hindman wrote: >>> ...vb.net and c#.net are virtually identical in their capabilities ...only >> >>> the syntax is significantly different in the latest versions and >>> you'll >> pick >>> that up fairly quickly ...learning the net framework is the major effort, >>> not the language you choose to work in ...I started in vb.net >>> because the >>> syntax seemed more familiar but that's really an illusion since it's very >>> different from vba in reality ...I've since moved to forcing myself >>> to >> work >>> in c#.net because 1) that's where the work is and 2) that's what >>> ~70% or more of the on-line responses and sample code are written in >>> ...and I live >> >>> on sample code ...besides which, there are some very good (and free) >> on-line >>> translators between the two now ...if I were starting over in net >>> I'd pass >> >>> on vb.net and go straight to c#.net >>> >> > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com