[AccessD] Simple-Talk commentary

"True relational database" is one of those terms whose every candidate is
bound to fail.

If anyone's interested, I posted a reply to Steve's editorial on the
Simple-Talk web site.

Arthur

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Shamil Salakhetdinov <
shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru> wrote:

> Hi Gustav --
>
> Yes, I have got the same feeling on the subject's editorial commentary.
>
> Although I have replied to Steve's posting here seriously.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Shamil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:16 PM
> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Simple-Talk commentary
>
> Hi Dan
>
> He tries to tell that he isn't an expert in this area and just sends up a
> provocative balloon for no other purpose than the fun.
>
> /gustav
>
>
> >>> dwaters at usinternet.com 17-05-2010 16:01 >>>
>
> However - does anyone know what he means (from his perspective) that Access
> is not a true relational database?
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>