[AccessD] FW: Beta expires soon - get Office 2010 today

Rocky, I don't know what the problem is, but not just the ribbon -- just a 
problem of fitting an apple into a pear I think .

Susan H.


>
> This issue was one of the first things I didn't like in Access 2007.  The 
> forms would often poorly fit, like you had purchased a 2nd hard suit that 
> sort of did the job, but you (and everyone else) could tell it just didn't 
> fit quite right.
>
> I am not using Access 2010 at this stage, so cannot comment, but a lot of 
> the forms needs some tweaking for 2007.  I hated Access 2007 so much it 
> put me off Access altogether.  I have office 2010 (sans Outlook - now use 
> thunderbird, and Access - trying to use SQL Server Express and VS) and it 
> is a much nicer product.
>
> Regards
> Darryl.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com 
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 4:05 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FW: Beta expires soon - get Office 2010 today
>
>
> "They seldom fit just right without a little adjusting." Because the 
> ribbon
> taking up real estate?  Or something else?
>
> R
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:40 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FW: Beta expires soon - get Office 2010 today
>
> Not really Rocky -- if you run it in 2003 format using 2010. I've not had
> any problems, but then... I wouldn't. I'm not running any comprehensive
> custom apps other than a small run I use to track my own work and invoice.
> It runs fine in 2010, although, I don't run it in 2010 much because it was
> designed in 2003 and it just looks a tad funky -- you'll want to check the
> way your forms, etc. load and look in 2010 -- there are some issues there.
> They seldom fit just right without a little adjusting.
>
> Susan H.
>
>
>> Hear of any 'anomalies' running a 2003 app on 2010?
>>
>>
>> ========I'm sure you can find a better deal than $500 somewhere - keep
>> looking. I'm writing about 2010 -- mostly skipped 2007. I include
>> instructions for 2003 and 2007/2010 -- pia sometimes! ;(
>>
>> If it were me, I'd wait until somebody asked. :) I like 2010 better
>> than
>> 2007 -- no contest, even though they seem so similar, 2010 is just
>> cleaner and better.
>>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> _______________________________________________________________________________________
>
> The information transmitted in this message and its attachments (if any) 
> is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
> The message may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
> review,
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
> reliance
> upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended 
> recipient is
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
> this e-mail
> and associated material from any computer.
>
> The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
> distribute
> the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files, with the 
> permission
> of the sender.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses.
> _______________________________________________________________________________________
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com