jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri Sep 10 15:07:18 CDT 2010
I took the 10g right from their web page "comparing versions". John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 9/10/2010 3:35 PM, Jim Dettman wrote: > > <<So the question is, would SQL Server express be capable of replacing Jet > for a complex bound > application for 30 users?>> > > I've never had occasion to try it myself, but from what I understand, for > 2005 and up that is correct. The old 5 connection limit was removed. > > However the DB limit is 4GB, not 10. > > Jim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 2:09 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving; Sqlserver-Dba; VBA > Subject: [AccessD] SQL Server Express - true skinny > > Does anyone know the true skinny on the limitations placed on SQL Server > express in order to > "throttle" it.? > > I found a blog that claims that outside of CPU / Memory / DB size > limitations, there is not other > "governor". > > So it appears that the limitations are: > > 10 gig db file size. This does not discuss additional database files. > 1 CPU. However it appears that it can use 4 cores if available > 1 gig of memory. This appears to be the killer. > > But there appears to be no "user" limitations etc. > > So the question is, would SQL Server express be capable of replacing Jet for > a complex bound > application for 30 users? > >