Doug Murphy
dw-murphy at cox.net
Fri Sep 10 16:24:14 CDT 2010
SQL Server 2008 Express home page would seem to imply 4G, but http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx says 10G/1 CPU. Nothing about connections as with 2003 version. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 2:04 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] SQL Server Express - true skinny This one says 4: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345154(SQL.90).aspx and I've always known it to be 4. Could have changed it though for 2008.... Jim. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:07 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] SQL Server Express - true skinny I took the 10g right from their web page "comparing versions". John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 9/10/2010 3:35 PM, Jim Dettman wrote: > > <<So the question is, would SQL Server express be capable of replacing > Jet for a complex bound application for 30 users?>> > > I've never had occasion to try it myself, but from what I > understand, for > 2005 and up that is correct. The old 5 connection limit was removed. > > However the DB limit is 4GB, not 10. > > Jim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 2:09 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving; Sqlserver-Dba; > VBA > Subject: [AccessD] SQL Server Express - true skinny > > Does anyone know the true skinny on the limitations placed on SQL > Server express in order to "throttle" it.? > > I found a blog that claims that outside of CPU / Memory / DB size > limitations, there is not other "governor". > > So it appears that the limitations are: > > 10 gig db file size. This does not discuss additional database files. > 1 CPU. However it appears that it can use 4 cores if available > 1 gig of memory. This appears to be the killer. > > But there appears to be no "user" limitations etc. > > So the question is, would SQL Server express be capable of replacing > Jet for > a complex bound > application for 30 users? > > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com