[AccessD] The Famous Bound/Unbound Debate

Ok.... and? 

Sorry, not in the mood to actually debate things like this... LOL

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart
McLachlan
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:53 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] The Famous Bound/Unbound Debate

According to you I was.   Your description of the second method  was
ONLY about the table 
structure, not the way the user interface was implemented :-)

-- 
Stuart

On 13 Sep 2010 at 17:29, Drew Wutka wrote:

> You weren't really using the second method.  
> 
...
snip
...
> > 
> > In a bound method, that memo field would be just that, one field, in
> > a table.  So as notes are 'added' to a ticket, you are modifying one
> > field, in one record.
> > 
> > In an unbound method, that memo field would be a separate table,
> > with an ID field linking back to the original table.  Each entry
> > would be timestamped (and stamped with the creator of the record). 
> > You wouldn't edit a 'comment', simply add a new entry.
> > 
> > There are pros and cons to both methods.

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI Business 
Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender 
immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. 
You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, dissemination, 
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons 
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.