jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sat Apr 16 12:51:16 CDT 2011
Stuart, C# of course. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/w86s7x04%28v=vs.80%29.aspx Unlike fields, properties are not classified as variables. Therefore, it is not possible to pass a property as a ref (C# Reference) or out (C# Reference) parameter. Properties have many uses: they can validate data before allowing a change; they can transparently expose data on a class where that data is actually retrieved from some other source, such as a database; they can take an action when data is changed, such as raising an event, or changing the value of other fields. >>> from Stack Overflow: >>> One use for a write-only property is to support setter dependency injection. Let's say I had a class: public class WhizbangService { public WhizbangProvider Provider { set; private get; } } The WhizbangProvider is not intended to be accessed by the outside world. I'd never want to interact with service.Provider, it's too complex. I need a class like WhizbangService to act as a facade. Yet with the setter, I can do something like this: service.Provider = new FireworksShow(); service.Start(); And the service starts a fireworks display. Or maybe you'd rather see a water and light show: service.Stop(); service.Provider = new FountainDisplay(new StringOfLights(), 20, UnitOfTime.Seconds); service.Start(); Expand your mind. Sit in the sun, close your eyes, contemplate your belly button. And yes, HoseTheTwitsDown actually is a method - which I was fantasizing about using... ;) John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 4/16/2011 12:20 AM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > Sorry, I can't accept that; A write-only property is the local equivalent of this: > http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/ > > If you can't get a meaningful value from it, then it is not a property - it is a method ( and I > don't mean a return value indicating success or failure of the SET) > > HoseTheTwits Down is a Method. >