jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri Apr 29 10:36:16 CDT 2011
Thanks for the heads up on that. Have you by any chance found an opensource for this that is considered secure? John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 4/29/2011 11:07 AM, Gustav Brock wrote: > Oops John, you missed my follow-up message: > > --- > Hi all > > I was told by one who knows more about encryption than me, Dave Howe, that: > > <quote> > PC-1 is an important part of the DES algorithm, used to prescramble the bit ordering on the key (and remove the parity bits) before starting the first round of the non-invertible s-boxes. These are also left-rotated between each round (by 1 or 2 bits, in a non-regular pattern) to form what is commonly called a "key schedule" or "subkey array". > > However your module is not using DES/PC-1, but "Pukall Code #1" which is a code Alexander Pukall designed himself - and which is widely regarded as insecure. Pukall shouldn't really have chosen the same name as the DES key schedule, as it does tend to cause confusion. > </quote> > > So, as a general warning, the code is fine for making clear text non-readable but should not be used for true encryption. > --- > > /gustav > > >>>> jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com 29-04-2011 17:00>>> > Thanks to Gustav. this is encryption, not hashing. > > Option Compare Database > Option Explicit > > ' PC1 Cipher 128-bit key > ' (c) Alexander Pukall 1991 > > >