Tina Norris Fields
tinanfields at torchlake.com
Fri Dec 9 10:41:59 CST 2011
Oh boy! Yeah, the user has a very different perspective from the developer. My township had an Excel spreadsheet for registered voters. The state developed a new standard and the spreadsheet had to be updated to match. Of course, in the township's spreadsheet the voter's name was just one cell, with no standardization for data entry (my name, for instance, could have been entered as "Tina Norris Fields," "Fields, Tina N.," "Fields, Tina Norris," "Mr.s Tina Fields," and any other configurations you can think of). So, I was asked to help. When it got to the field for a name suffix, such as "Jr.," "Sr.," "III," "Esq." and the like, the office assistant actually said to me, "No, we don't have to worry about that, there aren't that many of them." It had never dawned on her that the field would be required if there was even one person with a name suffix. I get it that our different perspectives color the way we see the problem. I just haven't figured out how to properly anticipate the user's likely take on it. :-) T Tina Norris Fields tinanfields at torchlake.com 231-322-2787 On 12/8/2011 4:06 PM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > Yep, there was "no way" that this would ever be run other than over a couple of hours during > a normal work day. :-) >