jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu Feb 3 21:21:46 CST 2011
And that is exactly why I am going to C# apps. I *hate* clunky web apps and I don't want to be the author of one. Eventually I will do C# and services. Maybe. If I can ever figure it out. ;) There's just too much to know. I think I'll turn it all over to Robbie and let him figure it all out. He can already tell me how to do all the stuff on the Windows 7 HTPC that I can't figure out. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 2/3/2011 9:29 PM, Mark Simms wrote: > I just LOVE that word "Clunky" to describe a web app !! > > When everyone says how great the web is, I just point out all of the > "clunky" webapps I have to tolerate....from my bank, to my insurance > company, and on and on it goes. Then I get to a client site and have to > tolerate all of THEIR clunky webapps. They are slow, they don't respond, > they forget to validate, etc, etc., they don't integrate with windows, they > don't cut-and-paste properly, and the list just goes on forever. > > I'm going for a long, long winternight's sleep. Someone wake me up when all > clunky web apps have been upgraded to Web 2.0 standards. > > >> make it 'look' like an access combobox, and act like it, but what's >> happening in the background is clunky. First, .Net is creating >> javascript on the client side that is reacting to the 'OnClick' of the >> combobox (or index changed event), then it's sending all the current > >