Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Wed Feb 9 12:37:14 CST 2011
Hi Shamil and Jim > And "Razor(CSHTML)" seems to be so much classical ASP like? Yes, but who - except for Drew - is writing code this way these days? I know you can create a complete site with Notepad only and lots of handwork but why? Don't you use Visual Studio or the like to create the in-line code? /gustav >>> shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru 09-02-2011 12:24 >>> Hi Jim -- MS does realize the issues "bound" to classical ASP.NET view engine - they seems to have a solution: Introducing "Razor" - a new view engine for ASP.NET http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/07/02/introducing-razor.aspx It "works with any Text Editor: Razor doesn't require a specific tool and enables you to be productive in any plain old text editor (notepad works great)." :) Well, but this "Razor" view engine seems to be bound to ASP.NET MVC? No, wait.... "Razor" view engine and DNN - they say it will be part of DNN 5.6.2 http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Resources/Blogs/tabid/825/BlogID/15/Default.aspx So - ASP.NET - "Razor" View Engine - jQuery (it's supported by MS) ===================== Totals as a very advanced yet lightweight, fluid (flexible) Web development platform resulting in clean HTML "by definition"? (I'm kidding about the latter of course - one have to be very skilled in HTML and CSS to produce clean HTML IMO). And "Razor(CSHTML)" seems to be so much classical ASP like? Thank you. -- Shamil