Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Mon Jan 3 15:37:45 CST 2011
Can you guys take this disvussion over to the VB. It's getting very long and way OT for the Access list. Cheers, Stuart On 3 Jan 2011 at 6:42, jwcolby wrote: > The curly brackets really just replace begin / end keywords in VB. > They mark blocks of code. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > On 1/3/2011 4:01 AM, Gustav Brock wrote: > > Hi Dan > > > > It appeared to me that to equip VB.NET with the same options than > > C#, MS have had to push the VB (or BASIC) syntax beyond its original > > intention: to be a simple language easy to learn and easy to use. > > Even with my solid VBA background I found it difficult to read > > VB.NET and I realised that a lot of learning was required. Given > > this task, I wondered if this wasn't the time to learn something > > really new to me, C#. Highly inspired by Shamil and the fact that > > about 95% of all code you meet when you look for code and tutorials > > about Visual Studio and .Net, and that the popularity of C# had to > > have a reason, I made the decision to go for C#. As everyone, I had > > a time struggling with the curly brackets, but once you get over it > > and begin to see the picture of the code, that picture is a beauty. > > I cannot explain it, but it just gives me more pleasure to write C# > > than VBA. Well, one reason is probably that I find it more well > > thought-out for the purpose - you really feel that this language is > > written by programmers (actually some of the best of this world) for > > programmers. > > > > This is just my opinion and preference. There really is no "best" > > language - I still write a batch file now and then - and everyone > > should pick what they like. > > > > /gustav > > > > > >>>> df.waters at comcast.net 02-01-2011 22:26>>> > > Hi Gustav, > > > > What was it about C# where you liked its syntax better than VB.Net? > > Especially coming from a VB6/Access background? > > > > Also - in C# prior to 2010 version, how did you work around not > > having optional parameters? > > > > Thanks! > > Dan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav > > Brock Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 3:30 PM To: > > accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] Moving to .Net > > (was Ded Moroz sends you ...) > > > > Hi Dan > > > > Don't know, but I did. And switched to C# to learn something new and > > because I didn't like the syntax of VB.NET. > > > > /gustav > > > > > >>>> df.waters at comcast.net 02-01-2011 19:48>>> > > > > .. But how many VB6 or Access developers (who loved VB6 and/or > > Access) have moved to .Net? > > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >