Charlotte
charlotte.foust at gmail.com
Sun Jan 9 12:26:17 CST 2011
Maybe I'm missing the point, but why would you *ever* expose the db on the internet? Charlotte Foust Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on AT&T Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> wrote: >If not using a VPN, at least change the default port from 1433. Using the default port makes >sense over a LAN, but makes it that much easier for miscreants if you expose it to the >internet. > >-- >Stuart > > On 8 Jan 2011 at 12:03, Eric Barro wrote: > >> SQL server listens in on port 1433. If you open that port on your >> firewall you should be able to see your SQL server db over the >> internet. However it's not advisable and is not generally good >> business practice to do so. The best way is to VPN into your network >> and then access SQL server that way. You will still need to configure >> SQL server to listen in for inbound connections on port 1433. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby >> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:35 AM To: Access Developers >> discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Across across >> the internet >> >> Next question, how do you expose a SQL Server to the internet. If I >> were to set up a MV that runs a SQL Server instance, how would I allow >> it to be seen through my firewall? I assume I would use SQL Server >> authentication with users / groups in order to control access. >> >> I have a dynamic IP and used to use an application that essentially >> provided a fixed IP by tracking the changes if any in my dynamic IP. >> Would I use that and port forwarding? >> >> Or could I use Hamachi and create a VPN in to the VM, then "see" the >> sql server over that vpn? >> >> This is all new to me. >> >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com >> >> On 1/8/2011 12:45 PM, Gustav Brock wrote: >> > Hi John >> > >> > Yes, often, at zero errors. >> > >> > /gustav >> > >> >>>> jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com 08-01-2011 18:28>>> >> > I know that the common wisdom is that Access Fe talking to an Access >> > MDB >> across the internet is a >> > bad idea. But what about talking to a SQL Server BE across the >> > internet? >> The issue with the MDB is >> > corruption. SQL Server doesn't corrupt, at least in the same >> > fashion. >> > >> > Has anyone tried this? >> > >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> > > >-- >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com