[AccessD] 2 quick questions

You got that part right. Agree 100%. It can become difficult, as in a couple
of dbs I have built in which 500+ tables were involved. I made no claim that
my solution was perfect. I just had to deal with a specific problem
regarding a specific period in time, and that's what I came up with. Anyone
with a better solution is most welcome to contribute to this thread. I am
always eager to learn from the experts on this forum.

A.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote:

> I like the concept of PITA.  The implementation could range from works fine
> to massive database bloat.  I think for narrow tables that change
> occasionally it would work great.  For wide tables that change a lot it
> would be problematic.
>
>
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
>
>
>