Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at Marlow.com
Wed Jun 22 18:28:50 CDT 2011
Jim, Just a word of warning... I completely agree with JWC on this. If JWC and I agree on something.... well, you can take it to the bank that if you disagree, you'll end up having egg on your face! ;) Drew -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:54 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Refreshing open forms when something changes Jim, > I'm not sure what it is I'm micromanaging<g>; all I pointed out was that if you implemented a message class as you outlined in your first post, it would be inefficient. That was, and I think you would have to agree given your responses since then, a legitimate point. To be honest I do not think it is inefficient at all. It would be inefficient if it made any damned difference at all. It doesn't. It would be inefficient if it were sucking up processor cycles. It isn't. Is it the absolutely most efficient method of accomplishing the objective? No, but it makes no damned difference. If I were to re-engineer it to be as efficient as possible I would save 1 trillionth of a percent of whatever metric you choose. The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI Business Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.