Gary Kjos
garykjos at gmail.com
Wed May 11 10:33:56 CDT 2011
From: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee681792.aspx ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The recommendations for which edition of Office 2010 to install are as follows: ----> If users in your organization depend on existing extensions to Office, such as ActiveX controls, third-party add-ins, in-house solutions built on previous versions of Office, or 32-bit versions of programs that interface directly with Office, we recommend that you install 32-bit Office 2010 (the default installation) on computers that are running both 32-bit and 64-bit supported Windows operating systems. ----> If some users in your organization are Excel expert users who work with Excel spreadsheets that are larger than 2 gigabytes (GB), they can install the 64-bit edition of Office 2010. In addition, if you have in-house solution developers, we recommend that those developers have access to the 64-bit edition of Office 2010 so that they can test and update your in-house solutions on the 64-bit edition of Office 2010. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GK On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Drew Wutka <DWUTKA at marlow.com> wrote: > Not to pull away from Darrell's question, but what do you mean that they > are doing everything they can to encourage people not to use it? > > That Office 2010 has 3 versions (the 32, 64 and 32/64) is an indication > that Microsoft is preparing for a Full, 64 bit ONLY version Office. > > To look at the push towards 64 bit computing, don't look at Office, look > at Windows. Most home users are getting Windows 7 64 bit without even > knowing it. It's the business world that is slowly making the > intentional conversion. > > This is more complex than the 16 to 32 bit conversion. The computer > market was nowhere near as large or as saturated as it is now. 64 bit > processors have been out since the 90's, but in the last 5 or 6 years, > all PC based systems have been coming out with 64 bit processors, that > are just allowing 32 bit OSes. I am willing to bet that the next > release, or the one after, will be available ONLY as 64 bit. > > Think of Office 2010 x64 as the Access 95 of Offices. It's follow-up > was Access 97, which just simply rocked! > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Bartow > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 9:35 AM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 32 vs 64-bit > > Hi Darrell, > I'd be interested in the reason they use 64 bit Office. Microsoft does > everything they can to encourage people not to use it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Darrell Burns > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:03 AM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: [AccessD] Access 32 vs 64-bit > > Hello. I developed a 32-bit Access 2007 app with VBA code that uses DAO > exclusively for data access and has no add-ins. My client has Windows 7 > 64-bit PCs running Office 2010 64-bit. I delivered the app as a 2007 > runtime > package and it didn't work at their place. > The app runs fine on my WinServer2008 machine with Office 2010 32-bit, > but I > haven't tested it under Office 2010 64-bit. > Since my other clients are still operating in the 32-bit world, I can't > abandon the 32-bit version. > Is there a way to satisfy both worlds with just one version? > > Thanx, > DB > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI Business > Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. > You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, dissemination, > or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons > or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- Gary Kjos garykjos at gmail.com