Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Nov 8 16:23:15 CST 2011
No, I heartily concur with that recommendation. SQLite is an excellent solution for single user applications with moderate data storage needs. -- Stuart On 9 Nov 2011 at 11:13, newsgrps wrote: > Thanks - more food for thought (lets hope Stuart doesn't choke on this one:-).) > > > At 9/11/2011, Kenneth Ismert wrote: > > > > > > newsgrps: > > > ... > > > Assuming that a similar application was created for actual distribution > > > what would be a suitable solution for storing the data in these > > > circumstances (or is a dot net application not the right tool for > > this job?) > > > > > > > >David, > > > >Consider SQLite: > >http://www.sqlite.org/ > > > >They have a number of .NET wrappers (about 3/4 down): > >http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteWrappers > > > >-Ken > >-- > >AccessD mailing list > >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >