Mark Simms
marksimms at verizon.net
Sat Nov 12 09:39:11 CST 2011
John - I think it's a poor strategy on Microsoft's part. IMHO: They should position themselves price-wise BETWEEN the ever-so-expensive Oracle and the ever-so-cheap MySQL. Instead, they appear to be moving towards trying to compete with Oracle... This is so "Balmer-like". > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd- > bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:27 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving; Sqlserver-Dba > Subject: [AccessD] New SQL Server license scheme is RADICALLLY more > expensive > > http://sqlserverperformance.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/sql-server-2012- > licensing-and-hardware-considerations/ > > The full retail license cost per physical core is $6874.00 for SQL > Server 2012 Enterprise Edition. > > I cannot imagine that there will not be a huge backlash about this from > clients and massive > switching to MySQL and the likes. > > I know that I will never purchase SQL Server 2010. > > -- > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > > Reality is what refuses to go away > when you do not believe in it > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com