[AccessD] New SQL Server license scheme is RADICALLLY moreexpensive

Hans-Christian Andersen hans.andersen at phulse.com
Wed Nov 16 12:01:03 CST 2011


Jim,

This is very good advice. Nicely written.

- Hans


On 2011-11-16, at 9:16 AM, Jim Lawrence wrote:

> Hi Shamil:
> 
> The TCO is an old and out of date concept. The phase was used when Linux had
> no GUI and most of its configuration had to be done at the command prompt.
> Linux products are now much more mature than they were in the late nineties
> when the phrase was coined. Note; just like any Windows or Linux, it
> sometimes requires you go under the hood but not for a basic or standard
> configuration.  
> 
> If a person is fully skilled at either Windows serversxx, IISx, SQL 20xx
> they can set up an operational system in a very short time but OTOH, this is
> also true for some person versed in Debian Linux sever (with Ubuntu Linux
> desktop), Apache and MySQL. Both the high end products are fully 64 bit and
> capable of managing multi-core processes. (The current Debian server OS has
> the capability to use a petabyte of memory, 128 to 256 cores(?) and could
> host over 10,000 users...it will take many years before the hardware catches
> up.)
> 
> I would think that it would take the same amount of time for the basic
> configuration of both.
> 
> This is also true for a station whether Windows7 or Ubuntu Linux 11.x. All
> will have the standard group of applications. Full Office, communications,
> music and video players, full networking, full list of internet products and
> on and on. Both Systems are incredible simple to setup, both systems have
> regular updates and both are easy to use and navigate around in and any user
> can get use to using either as they are very similar.
> 
> I would think that it would take the same amount of time for the basic
> configuration of both.
> 
> I have worked for years with various versions of Oracle and to install it is
> relatively easy. OTOH, to really optimize the DB you have to go in a tweak
> it very carefully to hardware and user requirements. In MSSQL, most(many) of
> these features are automated. Is that good or not, I do not know but MySQL
> can be the same. Many people just install and run it, as is but it can be
> tweaked to any requirement but like Oracle that takes a bit of training and
> investigation. Is that potential a plus or minus to the novice? 
> 
> If you have a problem with either MSSQL or MySQL or Linux or Windows there
> are plenty of books, Forums and blog sites with everything you will ever
> need to know. OTOH, if you have a serious melt down with in either Windows
> or Linux environment there is always an expert as close as the phone to
> help...and it is pay as you go...so much per incident.
> 
> Therefore, in summary as far as I can see, there is no difference in TOC.
> The only cost is in how much time it takes to become an expert in either or
> in both and how much the initial products cost.
> 
> Some other points to consider:
> 1. Linux is a very rugged product (it will run for years with little or no
> intervention). With Windows, it is constantly rebooting after updates and if
> left alone for too long it will start acting strangely and need to be
> rebooted. (20+ years from NT to 2008 server and still the same...at least it
> is consistent.) 2. Almost no malware can survive in the Linux environment.
> 3. The Linux footprint is very small. (About a third the size of Windows?)
> 4. Bugs in Open Source products can take days to fix while in proprietary
> products they may take years, if ever. A single OS product can have 1000
> contributors while I would suspect much fewer resources for the equivalent
> Windows products.
> 5. Linux can out perform Windows on a computer with much less resources.
> 
> Does this mean I am recommending everyone just abandon Window...hardly. They
> are the current standard and many of our clients use Windows products but
> OTOH I would suggest that every IT guy, who is planning to be around for the
> next ten to twenty years, become familiar with Linux as well.
> 
> Jim
> 
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com





More information about the AccessD mailing list