William Benson
vbacreations at gmail.com
Mon Oct 3 17:45:41 CDT 2011
You guys need a separate LISTSERV where you discuss all the things not fit for mere mortals. On Oct 3, 2011 6:14 PM, "Stuart McLachlan" <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> wrote: > Hack an Access container folder to fool it into thinking it is a different version and all bets are > off. You can't know all of the circumstances where those hacked bits are used in some sort > of test. > > -- > Stuart > > On 3 Oct 2011 at 16:47, Mark Simms wrote: > >> > All in all: It was definitely a bug.....tested in AC2010 - orig >> > release, >> > using a SplitForm. >> > I'll bet it's still in AC2007-SP2. >> >> What a story!! Ported the FE and BE to AC2007. However, I had a use a HEX >> EDITOR to make the 2010 BE compatible with AC2007. This is well documented: >> http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/print.html&client=printer&f=54&t=1948489 >> BTW: I used Winhex - greatly recommended. >> >> Strangely, on my first test in AC2007, I initially was getting a DIFFERENT >> ERROR MESSAGE. >> One related to disabling a control that had the focus. >> My GUI is complex and so that is a typical overlooked situation. >> I fixed that problem and of course the rest is history: >> No more 2001 errors - that was bogus. No need for Requery. >> >> Problem was totally and completely in AC2010 - an error condition occurred >> that was not trapped by "ON ERROR..." >> THAT'S IT. I cannot imagine what OTHER situations I am going to encounter in >> 2010. This could be scary. >> > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com