Susan Harkins
ssharkins at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 12:32:17 CDT 2011
Jim, you must have been reading my diary again. :) Susan H. > > And I do think your right; Microsoft is sliding Access towards the > end-user > end of the scale. We here all know it's much more then that, but it > always > has been marketed as an end-user tool and Microsoft seems to be focusing > on > that once again. Last couple of releases have been focused on simplifying > things and adding end-user features rather then anything for developers. > And long standing developer problems are simply not being addressed. > > What I see happening is Microsoft moving away from VBA for all of Office. > Access developers will be either pushed into VS or Lightswitch, which will > become Microsoft's light weight/RAD app development tool. Access may or > may > not remain in Office, but if it does, I think it will become a much > simpler > product. > > And before everyone gets up in arms about the "light weight" comment > above, > I do understand that you can do a wide range of things with Access and I > do > love it for that. But it does have some serious limitations. Access > developers have been ingenious over the years in working around a lot of > those limitations (i.e. lack of third party controls), but it has two > serious problems that nothing can be done about; corruption and > sensitivity > to its environment. The latter is more of a reference to VBA and > references, but how many of us have dealt with app install issues with > either the full or run-time version? Or multiple versions on the same > machine? If I asked those questions in a room full of developers, I bet > you > just about every hand would be raised.